Showing posts with label Religion. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Religion. Show all posts

Thursday, July 2, 2009

GOOD OR BAD

Good or Bad

In the beginning Adam and Eve broke the only law God decreed. For many, their disobedience, crime, sin tainted their entire progeny, meaning all humans. Despite that, the prevailing opinion of most ancient and Christian thinkers for centuries regarded man as basically “good”.

Religions, however, thrived on providing humans with eternal life despite their intrinsic contamination. For centuries the Roman Catholic Church and various forms of the Orthodox Church assuaged their members of the fear of eternal damnation by an elaborate array of rituals and rites. Performance of their obligatory sacraments and rituals, accompanied by sincere contrition could absolve all transgressions.

The various Protestant denominations and sects that Luther inspired after the second decade of the sixteenth century had in common a belief and practice based on the Bible. Both the Roman Catholic and Orthodox approaches to Christianity paid little attention to the Bible, but emphasized the role of Popes, saints and Church Councils. In their wisdom, they did not make the Bible available to uneducated, untrained laymen because they anticipated that uninformed perusal of the Bible might lead to bizarre practices based upon isolated snippets of Biblical text. Extremism in some elements of the Reformation proved the concerns well founded.

Most of the Protestant denominations and sects rejected any sacraments Jesus did not perform. Most adopted either Luther’s conclusion that salvation comes through ‘faith alone”. By this he meant faith that Christ’s death for the sins of man atoned for all who believed in the efficacy of Christ’s sacrifice. Calvinists, generally, embraced a more stern belief that emphasized the blight of sin from the time of the Garden of Eden. Calvin’s emphasis upon the Bible for Christian theology and the practice of the early Christian congregation for church practice concluded that no one could earn salvation. God’s grace, as an unearned gift, was the only means to salvation.

Jewish belief varies, but generally does not emphasize an acknowledgement of eternal life. Jews are simply obligated to live in conformity with God’s law and atone for their transgressions on earth.

Islamic belief basically avoids any validity of original sin by recognizing that God forgave Adam and Eve, therefore, each person and each soul begins life unblemished. God will judge them upon Judgment Day by their Book of Life, in short, according to how well they kept the law of God as revealed in the Quran and followed the dictates of God’s Messenger, Muhammad.

The contemporary evolving religion of Political Correctness does not address the basic nature of man. It tends to disregard or disdain whatever preceded it. It chooses its saints, willy nilly, to suit its purposes. Individuals, groups and institutions are venerated or condemned existentially in a cascading stream of regulations, laws and public opprobrium. Its practitioners will inform us whether we are good or bad and thereby merit their earthly acceptance or virulent condemnation.

SALVATION

Salvation

A cerebral and Biblically based friend of mine picked up on a comment of mine in an email. He cited several Biblical passages about works being insufficient for salvation. He concluded with this: So, the biblical Christian believes that salvation is by faith (in Jesus' atoning work) and NOT by self merit or good works, because the Christian realizes by faith that he can NOT be 'good enough' or do enough good works to 'earn' what can never be earned. He also mentioned grace, Calvin’s answer, but the emphasis firmly endorsed Luther’s conviction that faith alone was the way to salvation. My friends and I talk about such subjects, so he asked for my opinion. Below is my response.

Works, Faith or Grace seems to be the three possibilities theologians say we have to obtain salvation. I have studied and thought about this basic subject a lot since undergraduate school. I believe my conclusion is that neither theologians nor anyone else know the answers.

Profane or not, I do not dwell on the subject. To this point I suppose I simply have to think that I will try to avoid transgressing man-made law and hope I don't break enough of God's to go to Hell. My contemplation of this subject has not resulted in an epiphany of solid assurance. I care, so my failure to arrive at a definitive conclusion is not from a lack of interest or even effort. I have often thought it would be nice to have the conviction of the right path people I know of different faiths hold. If it comes, I wonder if I will keep it to myself or tell others. Many face to face conversations and publications have told me and it ain't done no good.

I do not want to engage in a prolonged discussion with Dr. Leonard Sweet and his ilk, who have educated and complicated responses on all theological questions.

As I look at the words above I see "I" all over the place. I try to avoid such a personal construction but it seems impossible on this subject. I will close by saying that on this subject I know a lot, but understand nothing.